Oscars Blog

  • The Ultimate Best Picture - 'Rings' Is King

    posted by Jonathan Crow - Tue Feb 17 2009, 8:02 AM PST 1335 comments

    One film to rule them all...

    Along with its eleven Oscars -- including Best Picture -- and its piles and piles of cash, Peter Jackson's epic saga of wizards, hobbits, and lethal jewelry can claim one more prize: according to Yahoo! Movies users it is "The Ultimate Best Picture." With over a total of over 700,000 votes cast, "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" vanquished Francis Ford Coppola's "The Godfather" to win the coveted title.

    The Ultimate Best Picture - 'The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King'  

    Yahoo! users no doubt responded to LOTR's groundbreaking effects (Gollum, anyone?), the brilliantly choreographed battle scenes, the great performances by the likes of Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen, and Elijah Wood, and the top-drawer source material. The trilogy itself proved to be a landmark of moviemaking if only because of its mind-boggling complex production -- simultaneously shooting all three films, using 150 locations and seven film crews, over a period of 274 days. The Academy was apparently just as bowled over by LOTR as Yahoo! Users -- it garnered 30 Oscar nominations, and seventeen wins, making it the most decorated trilogy in film history.

    The road to victory for "The Lord of the Rings" as "The Ultimate Best Picture" was almost as grueling as its production. Round One featured eight brackets of five Best Picture Oscar winners fighting to the death. And it was about as gory as the Battle of Helm's Deep. The victims of Round One included such favorites as "Gladiator," which was barely bested by finalist "The Godfather," along with others like "Casablanca," "Silence of the Lambs," "Lawrence of Arabia," and "Gone with the Wind."

    The eight films still standing squared off in Round Two. "The Lord of the Rings" faced its most fearsome foe in "Forrest Gump" in the tightest race of the series. At the time we called the race, "LOTR" lead by less than 1%. After voting officially ended, "Forrest" made a late surge, but the results had already been confirmed. In the semi-finals, "The Godfather, Part II" went down to "LOTR," as the first "Godfather" crushed "Schindler's List," setting the stage for this weekend's contest.

    Though "The Lord of the Rings" is no doubt a major movie, I was personally disappointed that "The Godfather" didn't win. Though perhaps it lacks the impressive effects and moral certitude of "LOTR," "The Godfather" is a sweeping tale about the complicated bonds of family and corrosive effects of pursuing the American Dream at all costs. In my book, it's a movie for the ages. What I really don't understand is fervent loyalty some audiences have for "Forrest Gump." But one person's masterpiece can be another's muddle-headed treacle. In a perfect world, "Casablanca" would have beaten "Gump." But then in a perfect world, "Forrest Gump" wouldn't have won Best Picture in the first place -- "Pulp Fiction" or "The Shawshank Redemption" would have taken home the gold that year.

    The other part of this entire effort we here at Yahoo! Movies have enjoyed is the thousands of user comments the topic has generated. Are you happy with the final decision or was there another film you think deserves it more? Let us know below.

    Are you happy 'The Lord of the Rings' was named 'The Ultimate Best Picture'?

    see results without voting
     

     

1335 comments

comments 1-10 of 1335  | newest | < newer | older > | oldest
  • eric s
    I love the LOTR movies but I don't really see why anyone should ever have to try to decide which is the "best" movie of all time. It's completely arbitrary. Surely I can love LOTR and The Godfather movies equally. Not to mention the original Star Wars trilogy, Gone with the Wind, Breakfast at Tiffany's, The Good the Bad and the Ugly, Deliverance, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, etc. e
    report abuseposted April 18, 2009, 8:35 am PDT
  • The Surrealist
    The issue with some movie/film lovers is that sometimes less is more and in other instances, more is less. Watching the Oscars, the Academy has many different categories for a reason i.e. Best Original Screenplay, Adaptation, Actor/Actress, Original Score, Director, etc. Every year, it's different. So ask yourself OVERALL, Acting, Writing, Directing, Cinematics, Sound, etc. How is LOTRs NOT #1?
    report abuseposted April 10, 2009, 3:57 pm PDT
  • Captain-Savvy
    LOTR didn't rely only on special effects... they were avaliable so they were used... without Tolkien's story and his vast world and beautiful characters, none of it would have been possible
    report abuseposted April 8, 2009, 2:58 pm PDT
  • emrage c
    ITS HARD TO PICK ONE MOVIE OF THE TRILOGY AND SAY ITS THE BEST.IT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A TRILOGY.NO WAY ROTK KNOCKS OUT GODFATHER(OR PT.2 FOR THAT MATTER)OR CASABLANCA AS BEST PIC! THE GODFATHER AND CASABLANCA ARE 1 AND 1A IN MY BOOK! I THINK IT WAS THE WORST OF THE THREE MOVIES WITH FELLOWSHIP BEING THE BEST AND TOWERS SECOND.
    report abuseposted April 4, 2009, 12:32 am PDT
  • emrage c
    ITS HARD TO PICK ONE MOVIE OF THE TRILOGY AND SAY ITS THE BEST.IT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A TRILOGY.NO WAY ROTK KNOCKS OUT GODFATHER(OR PT.2 FOR THAT MATTER)OR CASABLANCA AS BEST PIC! THE GODFATHER AND CASABLANCA ARE 1 AND 1A IN MY BOOK! I THINK IT WAS THE WORST OF THE THREE MOVIES WITH FELLOWSHIP BEING THE BEST AND TOWERS SECOND.
    report abuseposted April 4, 2009, 12:32 am PDT
  • djos49
    Granted, "Rings" was one of the greatest but, let's not forget "Citizen Kane", "Ben-Hur" , "Rebel Without A Cause" ; films that didn't rely on the technology that dominated "Rings".
    report abuseposted April 4, 2009, 12:18 am PDT
  • Phil
    Lordy Lordy Lordy! I'm glad the ring ruled them all! The trilogy transcends fantasy and special effects!
    report abuseposted April 3, 2009, 5:20 pm PDT
  • jackoslollylicker
    I thought it was the worst of the three, fellowship was unquestionably the best with the two towers a close second.
    report abuseposted April 3, 2009, 2:46 pm PDT
  • go girl
    I agree as an overall picture it is one of the great ones. What I liked about it was that even though Frodo was the main character, you did not get the impression that he was the main character, all of characters together made the film what it was. You got action, comedy, love, friendship, and evil, all rolled into one. Many life lessons were carefully woven into this movie, just fantastic!
    report abuseposted March 21, 2009, 8:28 am PDT
  • dum
    This movie definitely deserves the win. It stayed true to the novels and the Tolkien spirit while managing to be breathtakingly beautiful at the same time. The cinematography, coupled with the actor's performances makes this one, if not the greatest, movies of all time. The sheer scope of it all makes a person wonder why Peter Jacksons other movies all suck. lol
    report abuseposted March 21, 2009, 12:19 am PDT
comments 1-10 of 1335  | newest | < newer | older > | oldest

post your comment

Sign in to post a comment.

Sign In

The Best of Oscars